screenset and powermax45 tool table attached.
couple of caveats…
screenset, the alt+3 and alt+4 screensets are blank / partially finished… to be fair I only used the front screenset and put everything on it (axis jog buttons, MDI, wizard access, I use probe-it with a touch probe attachment)
If you want to edit the screenset, I used Machscreen
http://www.kd-dietz.com/klausphp/pages/eng/machscreen/description/ms_description.html
Also, my setup is metric… hence did not require 4 decimal places, so shortened the DRO’s as my machine does not have that step resolution in metric
Toolset… as stated above my setup is metric … hence the tooltable is metric
There are a couple of errors within the metric tooltable from the PMX45 cut tables… the best way to check is convert the imperial tooltable to metric and they will jump out at you…
This leads on to the next one… given Hypertherm is an American company it seems that all of their testing was done on imperial sheet sizes… so when they came to create the metric cutting tables, they just converted the imperial sizes to metric… problem is in the uk, we have metric plate sizes and we have standard sizes in between the imperial sizes… hence we don’t have 2.4mm… we get 2.0 and 2.5mm… hence what I did was to get the sheetcam imperial tooltable and convert it to metric using interpolation to the standard UK plate thicknesses available whilst still checking the PMX45 cut tables to check that the numbers aligned … which they do (hence I can see that all they did was multiply the imperial sizes by 25.4 and rounded them off … )
I have no need for the Mach3 screenset as I won’t be going back to Mach3, so if someone else finds a use for it great.
UCCNC … yes, you can ONLY use UC motion controllers (the developers have absolutely no interest in anyone else’s controllers period!) … which is a good thing as it means that they test the product against their 6 motion controllers (UC100, UC300usb, UC300usb, UC400eth).
They have a special on at preset (till stock lasts + 15/10/26 dd/mm/yy), where you’ll get uccnc free with a uc300eth s a new product release, saving ~$60. uccnc is licensed to the motion controller serial number… ie 2 motion controllers you need to license both controllers. It is very flexible, but only thing you cannot do is write a plugin to send motion to another motion controller.
I was a great advocate of the smooth stepper (I still have a USB + eth sat there…) but their slow development of mach4 plugin (with plasma, basically equal to what the Mach3 eth plugin does) has driven me crackers. I have been patient but the persistent statements of “soon” and “spring”, “summer”, “fall”, “winter” have just annoyed me, and made me realise the obvious which is you buy a product that works now… what it does in the future is just a benefit… the SS without mach3 / mach4 mill (the M62/M63 + THC does not work [yet]) is just a circuit board, and I cannot programme FPGA’s … if I could I would have had a go at writing a plugin for m4 (which I have a licence for and have been eager to use…) … please note that when you compare the smoothstepper motion controller development to the uccnc development, the guys at CNCdrive are very proactive (version 1.2022 was out about 10 days ago… testing has come back with some bugs (the release before was about 4 months and they put a whole lot of plasma stuff + modbus + macro functions into 1.2022 ) and last night they released 1.2023… and want to get back into a month or so development cycle release… that is planned development progress… [what needs to happen with Mach4 is they need to buy out a motion controller company with good market penetration and offer certified Mach4 hardware with a usb + ethernet motion controller and dump mach3 properly… any company fit that bill? hint hint
]
hence I’ll keep my smooth stepper in case M4+the SS ever gets sorted as I really hope it does its a nice bit of hardware lacking in planned development cycles. (I bought the usb SS in 2007/8… and it still does not do exactly what the ethSS does… eg. no THC, M10/M11 + backlash, but I dont use backlash anyway)