sheetcam.com

Thanks Les. I tried to figerout how to fix this bug, because i can't use pocket operation in my heidenhain. TNC do calculate from point to point, there is no place for mistake. Last year I wrote: The start circle point after plunge arc (CP IPA-196.648 Z-6.000 DR-) has to be exacly in the same point....

Yes. in the post is 0.0001.
What about calcuating in sheetcam. Is it the same accuracy?

HI Les

I check code in machine made in 2021.
Simulation give error : " circle wrong programed "


Is it possible to change accuracy of math calculations to exactly 0.001 without something more....

Thanks for reply.
Place where I mark red lines is diferent color, material to take out.

Hi,
One year ago we tried to fix the Heidenhain Post Processor TNC 410. Now i found the way.
Last circle on ( endZ ) has to be repeated do take rest of material.

Please look on pictures.
Coul You add some lines to post?

I check 0.0001 on tnc530 - work ok
but on my tnc151b doesn't work, wrong code error

X0.0001 is to long for Heidenhain
The one micron in metric is 0.001

Hi Les, I think i found the reason of the problem. Heidenhain work to microns. The start of the circle after plunge CP IPA+.... Z-..... DR+, the last circle "C X+..... Y-.... DR+ R0 F1500" have to be exacly the same point. On some shape the Post calculate 0.002mm mistake. The last circle i...

Put . instead ,

Previous post was ok but, why on 2,5,7 ramp angle path is ok.
on 3,4,6,8,9 angle was problem with path.

The angle Doesn't mater. All circle is diferent.
Size of this circlres depends from step over percent, when change the size is change as well.

nice path but circle diameters are diferent. All level done.

Last one.

It is strange because when i change tool to 8mm then ramp to 4 next to 5 degree. Path is ok.

I tried this as well, but no problem. Maybe Windows problem.

It is much better.
Next problem is when i change Ramp Angle. Look at the pictures.
When put 3,4,6,8,9 angle machine leaves material.
When put 2,5,7 angle is ok.